Friday, August 31, 2007

CHARTER SCHOOLS--JEWISH AND MUSLIM--IN THE NEWS. According to the National Education Administration:
Charter schools are publicly funded elementary or secondary schools that have been freed from some of the rules, regulations, and statutes that apply to other public schools, in exchange for some type of accountability for producing certain results, which are set forth in each charter school's charter.

NEA believes that charter schools and other nontraditional public school options have the potential to facilitate education reforms and develop new and creative teaching methods that can be replicated in traditional public schools for the benefit of all children. Whether charter schools will fulfill this potential depends on how charter schools are designed and implemented, including the oversight and assistance provided by charter authorizers.
Of course the fact that these schools are publicly funded is a plus--as in the case of the Ben Gamla Charter School, modeled after the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy in Minneapolis. The Wall Street Journal has a piece on this: Do culture-themed public schools cross a legal line?
Ben Gamla Charter School has kosher food in the cafeteria and Hebrew posters in the classrooms. In the planning of the Florida school, Tarek ibn Ziyad's experience was taken into account.

The success of Tarek ibn Ziyad's model, and its adoption outside of Minnesota, heralds a potentially explosive new trend in America's charter schools: publicly funded schools tied to a particular religion. The founders of Ben Gamla are already promising more branches in other states, and parents from other religions are sure to venture into similar territory, pushing the constitutional limits even further. As Peter Deutsch, the Orthodox Jewish congressman who started Ben Gamla, has said, it "could be a huge paradigm shift in education in America."

To be clear, both Ben Gamla and Tarek ibn Ziyad have worked to ensure that their actual curricula have no discussion of religious doctrine. Their language classes have been carefully scrubbed of any mention of God--and in Ben Gamla's case, Hebrew classes were suspended after state inspectors found a few questionable lines remaining. (The matter will be taken up at the next school board meeting in September.)
This charter schools are not the answer to an affordable yeshiva education, but it will be interesting to see how Jewish charter schools develop, and how far they can actually go.
So, the natural question is, what comes next? Not too surprisingly, the most concrete planning has been within the Jewish community, where culture and religion dovetail the most seamlessly.

Kevin Hasson, the Irish-American founder of the Becket Fund, says he would like to see an Irish school that touches upon the country's Catholic tradition and religious wars. "Only Jews have approached us for now," Mr. Hasson said, "but I believe there is no reason in the world to limit it to that."
Technorati Tag: and and .

2 comments:

Soccer Dad said...

FWIW the coverage of Ben Gamla as opposed to the coverage ofKhalil Gibran in the NYT is interesting. Similarly in the Washington Post, it's clear that reporters and supporters don't want to go into curriculum too much. I did not know about the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy.

Your point about "affordable Yeshiva education" is addressed by Jonathan Tobin. (Follow the link from Cross Currents.) And Elder of Ziyon fisks Samuel Freedman.

PsychoToddler said...

I don't understand. If all mention of religion needs to be stripped from the curriculum, how does this solve the Jewish education crisis?

In Milwaukee, we have vouchers for families that meet certain financial qualifications. And we can continue to keep our Jewish curriculum.

But of course we can't descriminate based on race or religion. So for a while we did have a Black non-Jewish family in the school. What they got out of all the Jewish classes, I'm not sure.