A British Foreign Office minister said Thursday that only direct Palestinian-Israeli negotiations can achieve peace, adding that the U.K would not recognize a unilaterally declared Palestinian state.That just seems a bit odd, considering how far Great Britain was willing to go back in November in making a point of informally recognizing a Palestinian state:
Wrapping up a Mideast tour that included stops in Israel and the Palestinian territories, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Alistair Burt said in Jordan on Thursday that Britain would not recognize a Palestinian state unless it emerged from a peace deal with Israel.
Speaking with the Palestinian Ma'an news agency, Burt said London could not "recognize a state that does not have a capital, and doesn’t have borders."
Britain Signs 'Treaty Between Nations' with PAIt sure does seem that Great Britain was doing everything in its power to recognize a Palestinian state short of making an official declaration.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague signed a “treaty between nations” with Palestinian Authority leaders on Wednesday. “This agreement is the first ever bilateral treaty between the two nations,” the British Consulate-General site proclaimed.
The treaty covers cooperation in the film industry. Hague signed a similar agreement with Israel.
Aside from its reference to the “treaty between nations,” the UK Consulate site also referred to Hague's trip to visit PA leaders in Ramallah as “his first visit to Palestine,” apparently recognizing a new country of “Palestine” before even PA leaders have declared one to exist.[emphasis added]
So, did something happen between November and January that caused it to change its mind?
Did they get cold feet or have second thoughts because they thought that matters were developing too rapidly with South American countries jumping at the opportunity to recognize a state?
Technorati Tag: Great Britain and Palestinian State.
No comments:
Post a Comment