Monday, March 21, 2011

Hamas Needs Renewed Support--Apparently Lowering Taxes Was Out Of The Question

The 50+ mortars Hamas admits to having fired into Israel over the weekend might not be an attempt to ratchet up the tensions as a prelude to something bigger.

Khaled Abu Toameh writes it may be that attacks on Israel are only means Hamas has to bolster its position, given the growing threat of protests:

Mortar attacks are aimed at dragging Israel into a military offensive that is needed by Hamas to rally the Palestinian public behind it.

The mortar attacks on Israel over the weekend were designed to divert attention from Hamas’s growing problems inside the Gaza Strip. The Hamas leadership has been under heavy pressure as a result of mass demonstrations in the Gaza Strip demanding an end to the Hamas-Fatah dispute.

After failing to prevent the protests, Hamas authorities began cracking down on the organizers, political foes and journalists.
The problem started last week when Hamas undercover police attacked thousands of demonstrators who came out in response to a rally for Palestinian unity coordinated on Facebook--about 50 demonstrators were injured as well as eight local journalists.

Then on Saturday, Hamas directly targeted journalists, raided their offices and confiscated their equipment. In the process, three Palestinian journalists were beaten.

Hamas clearly wants to prevent coverage of the protests in Gaza.

That brings us back to the rockets fired into Israel from Gaza--which Hamas made a point of claiming responsibility for instead of blaming other groups 'beyond their control'. Another IDF operation in Gaza is just the thing for Hamas to divert the attention of Gazans away from the protests, and the unrest behind them, onto the more convenient target: Israel.

By the same token, after Operation Cast Lead and the way Hamas ran and hid--leaving Gazans vulnerable--the Hamas reputation took a hit. Is that really what they are willing to do rather than deal with the protests?

Technorati Tag: and .

2 comments:

  1. I don't know how long this strikes will go on

    ReplyDelete
  2. If there can be sanctions against Iran and talks about sanctions against Libya, one would think there could be consideration of sanctions against an entity that regularly fires rockets at civilians.

    And one would be wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Comments on Daled Amos are not moderated, but if they are exceedingly long, abusive, or are carbon copies that appear over half the blogosphere, they will be removed.