Wednesday, June 21, 2006

'Peace Now' Could Teach Hamas A Thing Or Two

Arutz Sheva reports that Peace Now, in order to achieve their goal to get Israel to withdraw to pre-1967 borders is largely funded by foreign governments.

This is not really earth-shattering news.

Back in 2002, CAMERA reported that:
The EU reportedly provides much of Beilin's personal funding. According to an investigative report by Yoav Yitzchaki published in the Feb. 8, 2002 edition of the Israeli daily Ma'ariv, Beilin's salary is largely provided by the European Union (EU), as are his travel expenses. Beilin draws an annual salary of 350,000-400,000 NIS ( $80,000-$90,000) from the EU-funded Economic Cooperation Foundation (ECF) which he established.
Caroline Glick wrote, also in 2002, that the EU funded organizations like Rabbis for Human Rights, which organized delegations of foreign activists to stand in front of IDF tanks and try to force their way through IDF roadblocks.

One year before that, in 2001, the Jerusalem Post reported on the justification given by the EU for the funding they provide to left-wing organizations in Israel:
"The European Union has always held a policy of supporting non-governmental organizations that work for peace, democracy, and human rights in the civil societies around the Mediterranean," an EU official told The Jerusalem Post. "The Israeli government is fully aware of this funding and has never complained about it. The EU has never provided financial support for political parties," he stressed.

..."We don't look at the political complexion of the people who apply to us," the official said. "We look at the project and if it meets our criteria, it is a candidate for our support."
That the Israeli government has stood by and let this happen is just one more indication of their paralysis and inability to take even the most basic stands in the interests of the country. On the other hand, for the EU to brag that they do not look at the "political complexion" of whom they give financial support to--in a region that is drowning in politics--is irresponsible.

But apparently the EU feels that the PA qualifies as one of those "non-governmental organizations that work for peace, democracy, and human rights in the civil societies around the Mediterranean" since it provided financial support to Yasir Arafat's Palestinian Authority. According to Glick in her article, the EU was the single largest contributor to Arafat's PA since its inception, despite the evidence that the PA is a terrorist entity.

But now, according to Arutz Sheva, David Bedein is claiming that he has documents showing that in 2005, Peace Now bypassed the EU and has gone directly to individual countries, receiving payments directly from Britain, Norway, and Finland, totaling nearly a half million dollars. He also claims that for its 2006 budget, Peace Now has approached Britain, Norway, Canada, Germany, Holland, and Finland, with commitments from Britain, Norway, and Finland.

Considering how Israel has learned that one is beholden to the one you accept money from, the question arises how these foreign countries may have impact

This issue of accepting foreign money goes further than the fact that Peace Now is engaging in an activity that would require it in the US to register as a foreign agent. Peace Now is out to challenge the status of Jewish communitees in the West Bank and see to it that the Israeli government dismantles them. The article makes it clear that:
Such challenges often have direct impact on government policy and on the country's fragile social and political fabric. The government's decision to dismantle nine homes in the town of Amona, for example, followed a Supreme Court petition filed by Peace Now, claiming the homes were built illegally. The homes were destroyed in
a violent police action, in which hundreds were injured.

The violence and sharp polarization of Israeli society ensuing from the Amona tragedy may be playing into the hands of the same foreign governments which fund Peace Now. This is so to the extent that divisions within Israel's political communitiy weaken the government's ability to maintain Israeli control of Judea and Samaria in the face of world criticism.
All of this: funded by countries that are foreign--both geographically and in terms of their friendship--to Israel. That makes it all the more unsettling that Bedein claims Finland's contribution to Peace Now was forwarded to Finland by the U.S. government, according to what a member of the Finnish Parliament told him.

It's not surprizing that over the years Peace Now has become more emboldened--and successful--in looking for financial aid from abroad. No doubt they could teach Hamas a thing or two.

Once again, the Israeli government has taken a passive role and allowed these things to happen. It is not enough for the Israeli government to periodically authorize the IDF to make daring strikes against terrorist leaders. It is in the basic day-to-day running of the country that Israel's future will be assured.

Crossposted at Israpundit

Technorati Tag: and and .

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:25 PM

    This is very newsworthy to me, I was aware that Beilin's initiatives were funded by the EU, but I never considered that such organizations as Peace Now got government funding, I imagined they got UN funding indirectly.

    This revelation is surprising and shocking to me, and it reflects direct intervention in the state affairs of Israel by foreign governments, and I think your post has bigger implications than you have even alluded too. They are called non governmental agencies for a reason.

    It is such organizations that are endlessly petitioning the Supreme Court of Israel to as you stated affect Israel's borders, the implications of foreign governments having a hand in affecting Israel's highest courts and policies is frankly unnaceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A little correction: Peace Now does not mean that there is an end to Jewish settlements. Like Israel tollerates Arab enclaves in its Jewish state, Jewish settlements should be accepeted throughout the Arab world, and especially in places of religious significance. Peace can only mean peace if it guarantees the rule of peace fair to both. The aim may be far fletched, but it is not unattainable that Peace Now may one day lobby for exactly that too (the permission and protection of such Jewish settlements). Withdrawal means solely the overal Israeli sovereignity control over the West Bank.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Daniel: fair enough. But what is keeping Peace Now from making the headlines and great PR standing up Jewish communities in Arab countries? Is it the lack of foreign aid for that goal?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I will look into that Daled. I am an individual, not a groupie, so bear with me on that - since I have just joined...

    ReplyDelete
  5. dangerous stuff

    left-wing teflon

    ReplyDelete
  6. To Daled Amos Shalom
    You may find my 27 July blog on PEACE NOW
    of interest because it implores the US Administration to cease funding 'Active Political Measures'
    (a Soviet term) in Israel at this perilous stage in Israel's ongoing freedom struggle against THE MYRMIDONS OF ORIENTAL DESPOTISM
    Sincerely
    KH

    ReplyDelete

Comments on Daled Amos are not moderated, but if they are exceedingly long, abusive, or are carbon copies that appear over half the blogosphere, they will be removed.