I was surprised to see the book on the list, because based on the movie--I assumed that the book would be aimed at an older audience.
Not only was I wrong, but the book and the movie are very different from each other.
Unlike the movie, in the book:
o Oz is across the desert, not over the rainbow
o There are no farmhands or travelling mindreader to parallel the Oz characters
o The Wicked Witch of the West does not appear in the story until the Wizard of Oz sends them after her
o Dorothy and the Lion are captured by the winged monkeys, while the Tin Man and Scarecrow are badly damaged
o The Wizard gives bran and pins ("a bran new brain") to the Scarecrow, a felt heart to the Tin Man and a liquid to drink to the Lion.
And that's just for starters.
With all the news going on in the world, this is not exactly dynamite stuff.
But it will make for an interesting English paper.
I just hope I remember to tell my daughter about this ten years from now.
At Columbia, for my senior paper, I compared Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamatzov and the Talmud.
Like father, like daughter.
Technorati Tag: The Wizard of Oz.
And what about the silver slippers?
ReplyDelete(No I haven't read the books, but my three older children have. And they really liked them.)
BTW don't start with Elie, he hated the movie but loved the books.
I didn't want to give EVERYTHING away.
ReplyDeleteLike the fact that the Wicked Witch of the East and the Wicked Witch of the West are NOT sisters in the book
Or that both of the Good Witches appear in the book
Or that the Wizard of Oz takes on not only the shape of a big head, but also a woman, a monster, and a fireball.
Does your son know about the Wizard of Oz club?
OK, you've got to tell us more about that paper! : 0
ReplyDeleteSince I totally love the movie...maybe I should read the book, I had no idea it differs so much from the movie!
ReplyDeleteI read the book a thousand years ago. I remember it being interesting.
ReplyDelete