Throughout the tenure process, our faculty ensured that the established standards for tenure were their only consideration. Upon receiving the recommendations from the lower level faculty committees, the University Board on Promotion and Tenure - DePaul's highest academic committee - voted to deny Professor Finkelstein tenure, and the President of DePaul accepted that vote. We understand that Professor Finkelstein and his supporters disagree with the University Board on Promotion and Tenure's conclusion that he did not meet the requirements for tenure. The system is designed to give every applicant the same opportunity to achieve tenure, and has proven to be fair and effective. In every tenure case, the final decision is one of balancing the various arguments for and against tenure.That's rather bland compared to what DePaul has said in the past:
"In the opinion of those opposing tenure, your unprofessional personal attacks divert the conversation away from consideration of ideas, and polarize and simplify conversations that deserve layered and subtle consideration," school President Dennis Holtschneider wrote in a letter dated June 8. DePaul at the time verified the letter was authentic.The question now is where Finkelstein will pop up next.
And what will DePaul do about resolving the unwarranted suspension of Thomas Klocek.
Technorati Tag: Norman Finkelstein and DePaul.
Thanks for the link.
ReplyDeleteThe Reinstate Klocek at DePaul petition is just 37 short of its goal of 2000 signatures.
http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html#7915337517652689666