Sunday, July 13, 2008

Stopping The Kuntar Deal--Grasping At Straws

Haaretz has an article on a report delivered by Hizbollah yesterday, noting that it failed to give information on Ron Arad's actual fate--though Hizbollah believes he is dead--nor does it explain why his body has never been recovered.

The article notes:
One possible obstacle to the cabinet's approval is the terms of the current deal, which go against promises the state made to Arad's family when it redeemed Elhanan Tenenbaum in 2004 - not to release Lebanese terrorist Samir Kuntar without also obtaining substantive information about Arad's fate.
Emanuele Ottolenghi theorizes about how an Olmert government could handle that promise:
To keep its word to Arad’s family, this government now has three options: the first would be to keep the promise and, in the wake of Hezbollah’s vague report on Arad’s fate, call the whole thing off. The second would be to explain to the Arad family that the imperatives of state demand the return of Israel’s captive soldiers Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser, dead or alive, even if the cost is breaking a promise made four years ago to the Arad family. Then of course, there is the third option - stick to the deal with Hezbollah and challenge the meaning of the word “substantive,” thereby pretending that this government kept all its commitments.

The first choice might consign Regev and Goldwasser - or their remains - to the same fate of Arad. The second choice would give those two families a peace of mind which this very same act might forever deny to the Arad family. And the third course of action would be spin.
Ottolenghi has no doubt about how Olmert will handle that promise.
Does anyone?

Technorati Tag: and and .

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments on Daled Amos are not moderated, but if they are exceedingly long, abusive, or are carbon copies that appear over half the blogosphere, they will be removed.