She spoke on the idea of Nation Branding or Country Positioning, which is the new approach that Israel is taking in presenting herself to the world. This represents a departure from the traditional Hasbarah approach, which assumes that Israel's image problem is due to a lack of knowledge--that our goal is political support. (As a side note, this is also a departure from the approach that Israel needs half-naked Israeli women models appearing in Maxim.)
To illustrate how the world sees Israel today, Apfelbaum showed a short clip of a focus group study. Small groups of Americans sitting around a table were asked to imagine stopping by various homes, each one inhabited by a family of a different country, and described what they imagined they would see and experience. In each case, the participants decribed a pleasurable experience--all, except in the case of Israel.
When describing walking to and entering an Israeli home, participants described a home dominated by cement without a grass lawn. As opposed to all the other homes, in this one the man of the house answers the door--the woman of the home is not even seen. One participant said that it would be uncomfortable to enter, because the home would be 'Orthodox' and the people living there would probably not even want guests. In essence, many of the participants identified Israel with Saudi Arabia. It reminds me of when I was at Disney World--in the "It's A Small World" exhibit, Israel was represented by a chassid.
The key point is that here were intelligent Americans, Americans who tend to support Israel--yet they had no clue as to what Israel and Israelis are like. The fact that Americans support Israel is not because they actually understand or identify with her.
Pressed for time, she finished off with an outline of 3 basic Israeli qualities, about which there is going to be testing to see which resonates most with people: Passion, Ingenuity, and Fusion. She discussed the creation of a 'book' that would outline the key quality and its implemention and implied that bloggers would be helpful, each in their own way, by touching on the key quality in their blogs.
The marketing approach would be done on the community level as well, according to an article about a meeting with Jewish community leaders in Toronto:
A two-day “brainstorming” meeting was held last week in Toronto to discuss ways of implementing the Israeli Foreign Ministry’s “Brand Israel” program, which will focus on a “more creative, eclectic and yet more accurate picture of Israel,” said Ido Aharoni, founder of the ministry’s Brand Israel concept.It's going to be a lot of work.Toronto is one of eight markets, including Tokyo and London, selected for the pilot program, he said.
Aharoni was in Toronto last week for the meetings with representatives of UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, Canadian Jewish Congress, the Canada-Israel Committee, Hillel and Hadassah-WIZO, as well as marketing and public relations specialists with ties to the Jewish community.
Aharoni said the ministry has conducted market research over the past few years that showed “Israel is viewed solely through the narrow prism of the Arab-Israeli conflict… Israel’s personality is 90 per cent dominated by conflict-related images and some religious connotations,” he said. “Those of us who know the brand intimately are disturbed by the divergence of brand and the perception.”
...aspects of Israel are worthy of promotion, including its culture and arts; its accomplishments on environmental matters such as water desalination, solar energy and clean technology; its high-tech successes and achievements in higher education; and its involvement in international aid, he added.
Getting Canadians – both Jewish and non-Jewish – to see Israel in that light is part of the branding effort. Not only would that change Israel’s image, it could lead to more tourism and investment, educational exchanges and other benefits, Aharoni said.
...Aharoni said the pilot program will likely be launched in the next year or so. He said the branding process is a long-term strategy – it could take decades to change Israel’s “persona” – and will include several aspects. It could involve sponsoring a film festival, supporting cultural and sport exchanges, or junkets to Israel for Canadian opinion-makers. Once a brand is built, it becomes entrenched in the public’s mind.
Crossposted at Soccer Dad
Technorati Tag: Israel.
6 comments:
I've got some of the slides she presented as photos on my blog...here.
The research was great, but the solution was a joke (IMHO).
I had a teacher when I was at Colombia University--T. H. Gaster. He was the son of Rabbi Moses Gaster who worked with Herzl, which is why this professor's full name was Theodore Herzl Gaster.
He was a curmudgeon, who recalled being approached following the Zionism=Racism resolution by Zionist leaders who wanted to change the name Zionism to something else. His response was something to the effect that if you change the name, then Zionism itself no longer exists.
One could argue that likewise, creating this branding is not merely adding a layer and putting a face (facade?) on Israel, but changing and reinventing what Israel is all about.
But one of the problems with Hasbara--no matter how well it is done--is that Palestinian PR at this point can be encapsulated in a two-word bumper sticker: FREE PALESTINE. Any pro-Israel bumper sticker would be too long, because our PR is not visceral, it is full of explanations, history and dates.
The best we can do is publish books and articles. Leon Uris was the best at this with his book Exodus that almost singlehandedly created a narrative that lasted and was effective for a long time.
Scantily clad Israeli women in Maxim magazine is not the way to win the world over, but the fact remains that Israel has an image that is stark, dark, and foreboding. But this marketing is not about women in bathing suits and it is not even about telling people once again about Israel's scientific accomplishments. Instead it is about putting a face--a human face--on the country. This is an issue that actually exists independently of the conflict with Israel's neighbors and has as much to do about tourism and foreign investment.
There is no reason that the marketing angle cannot be done alongside the Hasbara. In fact, I don't see how we can afford not to respond to the lies and propaganda of the Arab world. Part of the problem is that Hasbara is reactive. Here is an opportunity to do something pro-active.
Oh, I agree with every word you wrote. My problem is with the approach, the face that's being put on.
Israel is attempting to create an impression that says "we're even more Western that you are!" That doesn't resonate, or even punch through the Free Palestine images.
Leave G-d, Torah, holiness and/or Jewishness out of the message, and there's nothing about Israel worth remembering. Then when the war image comes up, there's nothing with any real counterweight.
What I thought was interesting is that in the focus groups, they assumed that the typical Israeli home was religious, was 'Orthodox', but in an extreme way that mirrored what one would expect in Saudi Arabia.
The focus group obviously had no clue what a "religious" Jewish home is, nor what "Orthodox" really means.
And for some reason, probably good PR on the Arabs' part, they are totally unaware of what Arab culture is like, or worse - they are, but pretend not to know or acknowledge it.
This is serious. We really have to figure out how to counter the ubiquitous dislike of the world towards Israel and the Jews. It seems as if, if there is any negative event or cultural phenomenon, the global finger is always pointed at the Jews/Israel.
Daled Amos, as you say, "we cannot afford not to respond."
I'm not sure which was scarier--the discomfort of the focus groups when they discussed an Israeli home, or their ignorance.
These are the Americans who overwhelmingly support Israel--but it is not based on knowledge or a feeling of having something in common with Israelis.
So what really is the basis of the support--and how long can it last?
Post a Comment