Comparison of Israeli and Turkish Commissions to Investigate the Events of May 31, 2010
Criteria for the investigation, as defined by the UN Security Council (SC/9940)
- Prompt
- Impartial
- Credible
- Transparent
- Conforming to International Standards
The Israeli Commission | The Turkish Commission | |
| Duration of the Commission's Work (part 1) | The Commission was established on June 14, 2010, soon after the flotilla event. It completed work on its Report (part 1) within seven months | Established August 11, 2010, it finished its work by September. Its report was prepared in only three weeks. |
| Commission Transparency | o The Commission's website includes the testimony of most of those who appeared during its public sessions. o The majority of the Commission's sessions were public. A minority took place behind closed doors for security, diplomatic or other pressing reasons. The Commission itself decided which sessions would be public and which closed. The foreign observers were present during all of the sessions, including those that were closed to the public. o The Commission will make its report available online in English and Hebrew. | The Turkish Commission has no website, its report was not published, and it has not been made available to the public. |
| Authority to summon witnesses and receive documents | o The Commission operates with powers and authorities well-defined in Israeli law (specifically articles 9-11 and 27 of the Commissions of Inquiry Law. o The Commissions of Inquiry Law determines that the Commission shall have powers comparable to those of an Israeli civil court. o Every Israeli government body and official was required to cooperate fully with the Commission. They were required to submit to the Commission any information deemed necessary, and to testify before it if so requested. o The Commission was entitled to seek any information from the Prime Minister, Defense Minister, other ministers and IDF Chief of Staff, including via verbal testimony. o The Commission was empowered to seek the testimony of, or information from, any person or body, whether in Israel or abroad. It could do so regarding any subject which it believed was relevant to its investigation. o The Commission Chair was authorized, under the Commissions of Inquiry Law, to impose a monetary penalty on officials who refused to cooperate. (Under certain circumstances, in the case of an extended and unjustified refusal, the Commission Chair could impose a penalty of imprisonment for up to two years). o The Commission issued a public call to the flotilla participants, to the citizens of Turkey, Israel and all other countries, and to any other eyewitnesses with relevant information, to testify before the Commission. | Unknown |
| Evidence and testimony | o All of the information requested by the Commission was provided to it. o Dozens of witnesses were summoned to give testimony, including senior members of the political and military echelons. Among those who testified were the Prime Minister, Defense Minister, IDF Chief of Staff, Military Advocate General, Foreign Ministry Director General, National Security Advisor, Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, Major General Dangot, senior officials in the Interior Ministry and the Israeli Police, human rights and other civil society organizations, the head of the parliamentary Opposition and eyewitnesses to the events on the Mavi Marmara. o The committee examined thousands of pages of documents and hundreds of video clips. | Unknown |
| Impartiality and independence | o Committee made up of independent experts o The committee was given total freedom to determine the course and manner of its work. o The committee decided who to summon to testify, what information to request, etc. | Commission composed of government officials only |
| The legal foundations of the committee | Article 9 of the Commissions of Inquiry Law determines that the Commission Chair may, with the agreement of the other members:
| unknown |
| Issues investigated by the committee | The Commission was asked to examine whether Israel's actions were in accordance with international law. More specifically it was asked to-
| unknown |
It should be noted that the Turkel commission is in fact the second Israel committee established to examine the events of May 31, 2010. The findings of the committee headed by Major General (ret.) Giora Eiland were submitted to the Turkel Commission, and Eiland himself gave testimony before that commission.
Commission Members:
Israeli Commission | Turkish Commission | |
| Commission Character | Public and independent commission headed by a former Supreme Court justice | Internal government commission |
| Commission members | Jacob Turkel, Committee Chair
| Officials from various government offices. Individual identities are not known |
| Amb. Shabtai Rosenne (note- Amb. Rosenne passed away on Sept. 21, 2010, while the Commission's work was in progress)
| ||
Major-General (Ret.) Amos Horev
| ||
Prof. Miguel Deutch
| ||
Amb. Reuven Merhav
| ||
| Foreign Observers on the Commission: Took an active part in all facets of the Commission's work, including its discussions, consultations, and examination of witnesses. | Brigadier-General_(Ret.) Kenneth W. Watkin,
| |
The Rt. Hon.(William) David Trimble, Lord Trimble
|
Technorati Tag: Turkel Commission and Mavi Marmara and Gaza Flotilla.

0 comments:
Post a Comment