FLYING IMAMS TO SUE US AIRWAYS, as American Thinker quotes from the online article in the Minnesota Star Tribune. As Powerline points out, it seems that in this case at least, people are onto them.
JPost carried the AP article as well: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173823732422&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
It's incredibly biased against the airline and neglects to mention anything about the Imams' suspicious behavior. The article basically says that a passenger became suspicious because he saw them praying in the airport, so US Airways kicked them off the flight.
I have no idea why the Jerusalem Post prints this crap.
Also, why couldn't the airline have waited till after takeoff to kick them out?
1 comment:
JPost carried the AP article as well:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173823732422&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
It's incredibly biased against the airline and neglects to mention anything about the Imams' suspicious behavior. The article basically says that a passenger became suspicious because he saw them praying in the airport, so US Airways kicked them off the flight.
I have no idea why the Jerusalem Post prints this crap.
Also, why couldn't the airline have waited till after takeoff to kick them out?
Post a Comment