On the one hand, CAIR's brief in the Holy Land Foundation trial confirms Hudson's story. Indeed, it cites Hudson's story to support its argument. CAIR's brief also shows CAIR's contemporaneous statement disputing the accuracy of Hudson's story to be false. CAIR freely lies to suit its convenience.Read the entire post. This trial is getting interesting.
On the other hand, however, CAIR's amicus brief lies when it suggests that Hudson's story supports its argument in the Holy Land Foundation case. The government named CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator of the Holy Land Foundation this year during the first week of June. Hudson's Washington Times story was based on data covering the period 2000-20006, before CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator. CAIR's citation of Hudson's story in support of the argument made in its brief is another lie of convenience.
In spite of The New York Times.
Technorati Tag: CAIR.
No comments:
Post a Comment