Freeman Attacked The Wrong Lobby!

In his statement, Freeman claimed:

The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East.

But actually, Freeman has got it all wrong!

Jennifer Rubin writes that it apparently not the Israel Lobby that is stifling Freeman's views:

Like the old joke, “Franco is still dead,” the New York Times is still mum on the Chas Freeman nomination. Aside from an automated response, Clark Hoyt, the public editor previously charged with explaining why the Times didn’t report for weeks on the Reverend Wright story, hasn’t responded to my inquiry as to why the Times remains mute.

Mark Steyn adds:

Poor old Freeman. He has the guts to spill the beans on the Israel Lobby, and either their stooge Pincus [of The Washington Post] or the sinister cosmopolitan Jews who control America's Union of Newspaper Delivery Boys hoover any reference to the dark truth out of the paper before it reaches your doorstop.

Starting to day, though, The New York Times and The Washington Post will come out about this surprising story that apparently came out of nowhere.

Technorati Tag: Chas Freeman and Media Bias.