Monday, December 29, 2008

One Jerusalem--End of Week Review: December 28, 2008

From an email:
End of Week Review: December 28, 2008

Dear Friend of Jerusalem,

Here are the latest headlines from the One Jerusalem Blog:

Obama, Hamas, Crucifixion...: This week Hamas enacted a Sharia (Islamic Law) criminal code for the Palestinian Authority which legalizes crucifying enemies of Islam. You can't make these things up. The ancient barbarity of crucification is brought back to life on the same week... (read more)

In Depth Survey on Israeli Political Attitudes: In a poll conducted by the Maagar Mohot Institute, headed by Professor Yithak Katz:Mandates by blockRight wing- Haredi: 66Left-Zionist: 42 (Kadima, Labor, Meretz)Unidentified: 3 (pensioners, Green)Anti-Zionist: 9 ... (read more)

Christmas Outrage: In the United Kingdom, Channel 4 television announced that it will broadcast a Christmas meassge from Iran's anti-semitic, radical Islamist President Mahmoud Ahadinejad. Israel's Ambassador to the United Kingdom, Ron Prosor, condemned this action: "It is an unprecedented scandal for... (read more)

Likud Maintains Lead: In a poll commissioned by Israel's 1st television channel, Likud has established a clear lead over Kadima and the other parties.The poll results (released tonight) also include some interesting data on how Israelis see their government and efense Minister Ehud... (read more)

In Jerusalem, On The First Day of Hannukah: The City of David Foundation is reporting that a British volunteer has unearthed the largest cache of ancient coins ever found in Jerusalem. 264 gold coins aged 1,400 years. The coins have a portrait of what appears to be the... (read more)

Latest Israeli Polls: In our continuing coverage of Israel's General Election campaigns we present an Israeli radio stations report on an average of three recent polls: Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;... (read more)

Together we can win the fight to maintain a united Jerusalem!

The One Jerusalem Team
Technorati Tag: .

World Wide Hachnasat Sefer Torah To Commemorate Those Murdered At Yeshivat Mercaz Ha'Rav

From an email:
Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future

B'LEV ECHAD
World Wide Hachnasat Sefer Torah & Siyum
Rosh Chodesh Adar 5769 ~ February 24, 2009

Chaverim,

As Chanukah winds down, we celebrate and reinforce the process of transforming darkness into light. In this spirit, I would like to share details of an upcoming project in which I deeply encourage you to participate.

Nearly a year has passed since the tragic night, when a terrorist killed eight boys/young men from Yeshivat Mercaz Ha'Rav and Yeshivat Yerushalayim LeTze'irim. As the first anniversary of their untimely deaths approaches, the Jewish community is responding with an event that will be a true Kiddush Hashem.

To commemorate this tragedy, a new project, B'Lev Echad, hopes to unite the global Jewish community through a program of learning Torah and doing mitzvot in memory of those who died and devoted their lives to these causes. The project will culminate with a siyum and the dedication of eight Sifrei Torah at Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav with an inspiring program to be broadcasted live to all corners of the Jewish world. The event is scheduled to take place on the yartzheit, Rosh Chodesh Adar - February 24th 2009, and Jews around the world are being asked to participate in this worldwide siyum and join this event via a live Internet broadcast. There will also be an '8-for-8 Mitzvah Campaign" where each day leading up to this event will focus on a specific mitzvah in memory of the eight young men. Additional information about this project as well as the siyum can be found on the B'Lev Echad website.

I am especially proud of the several YU students and alumni who are part of this grassroots planning committee and the many more who already signed up to volunteer. By design, the B'Lev Echad project is not being funded by any specific organization, in the hopes that it will attract Jews from all across the religious spectrum, nor is it asking for any donations.

I encourage you, your school, or your community to be an active part of this unprecedented celebration of unity by watching the live broadcast, participating in a worldwide siyum, and joining the 8-for-8 mitzvah campaign. You can get more information, sign up your yeshiva, school or community, or sign up as a volunteer on the project's website: www.BlevEchad.com.

Kol tuv,

Kenneth Brander


Technorati Tag: .



Hamas--Not Your Father's Hizbollah

(Note: In addition to Israellycool, Jameel at Muquata is also liveblogging.)

No, not nearly...

Hamas--Still Small Time Terrorists

Hamas has been showing signs of being a Hizbollah wannabee:

Hizbollah kidnaps Israeli soldiers--Hamas kidnaps Gilad Shalit.
Hizbollah builds extensive underground bunkers--Hamas follows suit.
Hizbollah bombed Israel during its war--Hamas figures it can bomb Israel forever.

Hamas appears to have miscalculated. Israel's constant threat to retaliate, which it never follow convincingly followed up on, suddenly became a tactic that lulled Hamas into a false sense of security.

Unlike Hizbollah, whose kidnapping of Israeli soldiers was followed soon after by the Israeli counter attack, Hamas used the latest truce as a time to regroup--not realizing that this afforded Israel the same opportunity.

Sure, both Hamas and Hizbollah are funded by Iran--but Hizbollah is in the big time, having killed hundreds of American soldiers and lived to tell the story. Hizbollah has not only the support of Iran, but of Syria as well. Hamas, on the other hand, has been nothing but annoying to their closest neighbor, Egypt--especially after the incident of tearing down the barrier and allowing a flood of Gazans into their country.

Hamas Has No Friends

Actually, it's not clear that there is any Arab country that is particularly fond of Hamas--just as Palestinians in general do have many friends in the Arab world.

Over a week ago, Dan Diker, a foreign policy analyst with the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, posted at Powerline about how much Arab countries wanted Israel to teach Hamas a lesson:
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak expressed his concern to the Arab press that "Egypt shares a border with Iran following Hamas' May 2008 rocket assault on the Israeli city of Ashkelon with Iranian manufactured grad rockets.

Earlier this month Egyptian Foreign Minister Egypt's Ahmed Abul Gheit warned that Cairo would never accept an "Islamic emirate" in Gaza -- a key stated goal of Hamas. Mohammad Abdallah Al Zulfa, member of The Saudi Shoura Council said yesterday on the Arab network's Alhurra news program that "Iran is the big threat in today's world, supporting all the terrorists from Hamas to Hezbollah to some other terrorists that we don't know their names yet". "Iran destabilized the region by supporting all the illegal activities and activists such as Hamas...."

Not All Of The Arab Outcry Is Against Israel

Now that Israel is carrying out its operation against Hamas, the universal condemnation usually expected from the Arab world is just not there. The Jerusalem Post reports on the reaction from Abbas:

"We spoke to them and told them 'Please, we ask you not to end the cease-fire. Let it continue,'" Abbas said during a joint press conference with Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit. "We want to protect the Gaza Strip. We don't want it to be destroyed."

Hamas could have prevented the "massacre" in the Gaza Strip, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said Sunday in Cairo.

Not that one would necessarily expect much sympathy from Abbas.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit, mentioned above by Diker, did not hide how he felt about Hamas either:

Aboul Gheit also attacked Hamas, saying the group had prevented people wounded in the Israeli offensive from passing into Egypt to receive medical attention.

"We are waiting for the wounded Palestinians to reach Egypt. They aren't being allowed to go through," he said.

Asked who was to blame for the dire situation in Gaza, the foreign minister replied: "Ask the party that controls Gaza."



This Time, Egypt Is Ready To Stop The Flood Of Gazans

But just because Gheit is offering to allow the Palestinian wounded in apparently does not mean that he wants a repeat of the flood of Palestinians like last time. This time around, Egypt seems to be ready--and intent on keeping Palestinians out:

Egyptian border guards have opened fire on Palestinians who breached the border to escape Israel's assault on Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

An Egyptian security official said there were at least five breaches along the nine-mile border and hundreds of Palestinian residents were pouring in.

At least 300 Egyptian border guards have been rushed to the area to reseal the border, the official added on condition on anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the press.

A resident of the Gaza Strip side of the border, Fida Kishta, said that Egyptian border guards opened fire to drive back the Palestinians.

...Dr Abdel Qader Higazi, a representative of the Egyptian Doctor's Syndicate in Rafah said Egyptian authorities closed the border crossing after allowing several trucks of medical supplies into Gaza.

Who Does Stand Beside Hamas?

True--Iran, Syria, and Hizbollah spoke out against Israel and about the need for Arabs to come to the aid of Hamas. That is to be expected--especially since if Israel can really pull off a significant decrease in Hamas' effectiveness, it could be seen as a warning to those 3 in particular while reassuring the other Arab countries that Iran can be stopped.

Hitting Hamas As A Way Of Striking Back At Iran

So it comes as no surprise that in another post for Powerline, Dan Diker wrote that Saudi Arabia also has not come out in support of Hamas. Instead, the Saudis made it very plain how they feel about the Iranian threat and the proxies Iran is using:
Mohammad Abdallah Al Zulfa, member of the Saudi Shoura Council said on the Alhurra Arabic TV news program on December 17 that "Iran is the big threat in today's world, supporting all the terrorists from Hamas to Hezbollah to some other terrorists that we don't know their names yet" and "Iran destabilized the region by supporting all the illegal activities and activists such as Hamas."
A Great Opportunity

If Israel can really pull this off--pulling Hamas down a few pegs--it may have the larger effect of taking Iran down a notch as well. It may also give reason to Nasrallah, who already hides in a bunker, reason to be cautious about what he says and does.

Israel had a tremendous opportunity in its war against Hizbollah--and was unable to capitalize on it. A lot is riding on what Israel is doing now against Hamas.

And so far, it seems to be working.

Check out memeorandum for examples of (predictable) reaction to Israel's counter-attack on Gaza.

Technorati Tag: and and .



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, December 27, 2008

IDF Strikes Back At Hamas in Gaza (Updated)

Last updated at 11:44pm

Note: Israellycool is live-blogging the Israeli retaliation against Hamas

Tracking the action in Sderot

If you want to keep track of the Qassam strikes on Sderot, check out the QassamCount tweet from Sderot, which I also have on my blog to the left.
There is also an RSS feed.

Elder of Ziyon has a calendar tracking the daily rocket attacks from Hamas in Gaza.
Israel At Level Ground has a series of posts that have been tracking rocket attacks from Gaza.

Overview of what the IDF is doing in Gaza

The IDF site has some overall info on the strike into Gaza:
The IDF Strikes at Hamas Terror Infrastructure in the Gaza Strip
27 December 2008 , 18:47

On Saturday morning (Dec. 27), the IDF implemented the "Cast Lead" operation in a series of aerial strikes against Hamas targets and terror infrastructure facilities, in the Gaza Strip. All Israeli pilots returned safely to their bases. The strikes were implemented in light of the ongoing terrorist activities by the Hamas terror origination in the Gaza Strip, and the continuation of rocket and missile fire at southern Israel and the injuring of Israeli citizens living the towns and cities of southern Israel. The IDF will continue its operations against terrorists in accordance with constant assessments held by the Chief of Staff. This operation will be continued, expanded and intensified as much as required.

The information on targets that were hit was gathered by the Intelligence Corps during the past few months and the targets include Hamas terror operatives that operated from the organization's headquarters, training camps and weaponry storage warehouses.
From Artuz Sheva: IDF Releases Photos of Hamas Targets, Terror Training Facilities
The IDF on Saturday night released aerial photos of Hamas facilities targeted by IAF fighter pilots on Saturday in Operation 'Cast Lead.'

The photos show the military training facilities Hamas has developed in Gaza, from where Israel forcibly evicted close to 10,000 of its Jewish citizens in August 2005 in hopes of establishing peace with its Palestinian Authority Arab neighbors.
Check out the pictures.

Note that these are pictures of the facilities before being hit.

And how did Israel get the necessary intelligence about Hamas targets? What's good for the goose...

Long-term preparation, careful gathering of information, secret discussions, operational deception and the misleading of the public - all these stood behind the Israel Defense Forces “Cast Lead” operation against Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip, which began Saturday morning.

The disinformation effort, according to defense officials, took Hamas by surprise and served to significantly increase the number of its casualties in the strike.

Sources in the defense establishment said Defense Minister Ehud Barak instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare for the operation over six months ago, even as Israel was beginning to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Hamas. According to the sources, Barak maintained that although the lull would allow Hamas to prepare for a showdown with Israel, the Israeli army needed time to prepare, as well.

First Reactions From Europe

Emanuele Ottolenghi notes the expected response from Europe:
Less than a day after Israel began its long overdue operation against Gaza, European journalists are already dispensing their predictable wisdom on why Israel can’t win and why its actions will inevitably - and always - boomerang. Ian Black, writingin theGuardian, warns of the likelihood that support for Hamas among Palestinians will increase. Now, there are many ways one could criticize Israel’s operation and be thoughtful (for example, by saying that Israel might have acted earlier); Black’s attempt is not one of them.

First, Israel’s operation is not a PR exercise to win the hearts and minds of Palestinians. Second, Hamas already has plenty of Palestinian support - it won an election, remember? And it was a fair one, believe it or not. Third, who cares about public support? A party that has just announced it will chop off thieves’ hands, and strictly enforce all other manner of Islamic punishment is not exactly concerned about “hearts and minds.”

Repressive regimes don’t need support if they are willing and capable of terrorizing their own populations, and defeating them is not best done by convincing their frightened citizens to rebel. If in doubt, ask Iraqis how easy it was to do so under Saddam Hussein . They can now give you an honest answer.

John Podhoretz notes that although the results of the attack are not known right away:
But there are three things to say about it immediately. First, when you hear people call on Israel to show “restraint,” remember that “restraint” is precisely what Israel has been showing for the past three and a half years as Hamas has launched thousands of Kassam rockets at Sderot and other locations inside Israel. Second, this was not an attack but a counter-attack, almost purely an act of self-defense that featured extensive warnings in the days before it was launched in an effort to minimize civilian casualties. Third, the Hamas terror bases were evidently located in civilian neighborhoods. According to international law, the responsibility for any civilian casualties in such a situation rests entirely with those who a) failed to wear uniforms and b) interwove themselves with non-combatants. The fault is Hamas’s, not Israel’s.
Bradley Burston of Haaretz also addresses the claims for Israeli restraint. He writes:
It is, abruptly and again, wartime. Across the globe, the selective pacifists of the left and the recliner Rambos of the right are spoiling for their next battle, the war in Gaza.

They will fight one another in letters to Congress, in cable news sound bites, in raucous talk-radio phone-ins, in the virtual mega-heroics of the online battlefield of the talkback.

They will fight one another in the United Nations as well, unashamedly one-sided in their concern for human life.

Herewith the first in a two-part guide to the 10 most gratuitous, least productive, most resolutely ingenuous claims likely to be hurled in an effort to attack Israel.

The first five are arguments of the anti-Israel left, claims which are, curiously, as tired as they are unflagging.
Read it!

Ed Morrissey knows what world's reaction should be:
The world should step aside and quit interfering in the war Hamas so desperately wants and will desperately lose if left to their own devices. As long as Hamas controls Gaza, a state of war exists, and cease-fires do nothing to advance peace, as this year has proven yet again. Tiresome calls for “restraint” don’t work when one side is determined to have war. The best way to resolve this conflict is to allow Hamas to have its war and get utterly crushed by Israel or overthrown by Gazans to avoid that unavoidable conclusion.
In Star Trek, Captain Kirk and Ariel Sharon, I quoted Amir Taheri that it is the world's attitude--preventing a conclusion to a war and sticking to it--that has allowed the conflict to continue and reach this stage.

So What Is Israel's Goal As The IDF Goes Into Gaza?

Noah Pollak puts it best:
Israel’s job is not necessarily to topple Hamas rule — that would be a tall order, being that there is no competent Fatah force to replace Hamas in Gaza — but to humiliate the swaggering resistance, to kill as many of its leaders and militants as possible, and to demonstrate to Hamas’ allies that the IDF and Israeli government learned the right lessons from the 2006 war. This will require more strikes like those of this morning, and it will require the IDF to stop Hamas’ rocket fire — either through military dominance, or by forcing Hamas to conclude that it must cease its attacks lest its rule be terminated. The former is much more likely than the latter.
Shmuel Rosner sees this restraint implied in Olmert's own words:
One should listen carefully to the words uttered just minutes ago by Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in the wake of the military operation in Gaza. He was not talking about toppling Hamas’s rule - as both his Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and opposition leader Binyamin Netanyahu have advocated just days ago. Olmert, burned by his painful 2006 Lebanon experience, rejected the ambitious goals that these two contenders for Prime Ministership have made parts of their campaign.
Fear of Repraisals

Allison Kaplan Sommer reports for Pajamas Media on the importance of the timing of the retaliation:
Saturday was the appropriate day to do it from the Israeli perspective — a day when stores would be closed, schools wouldn’t be in session, and residents of Sderot, Ashkelon and other parts of southern Israel would be in their homes with their families, where they were ordered to stay, close to their shelters.

Spookily, Israeli television broadcast live from all of the hospitals in the southern part of the country even before any casualties were showing up, a reflection of the fear of the size and nature of the reprisals that are expected — as were the ambulances deployed across the region. It didn’t take long until they arrived; residents of the city of Netivot rushed into shelters as rockets began to fall there — all broadcast live on television. Similar scenes in Sderot quickly followed as the Israeli casualty list began.
Reaction From the Palestinian Authority

Apparently the PA is all set should Hamas be removed from power:

Palestinian Authority officials in Ramallah said Saturday that they were prepared to assume control over the Gaza Strip if Israel succeeds in overthrowing the Hamas government.

"Yes, we are fully prepared to return to the Gaza Strip," a top PA official told The Jerusalem Post. "We believe the people there are fed up with Hamas and want to see a new government."

Another PA official said Fatah had instructed all its members in the Gaza Strip to be prepared for the possibility of returning to power.

"We have enough men in the Gaza Strip who are ready to fill the vacuum," he said. "But of course all this depends on whether Israel manages to get rid of the Hamas regime."[Hat tip: Israel Matzav]

Apparently the PA is unaware that one vacuum cannot fill another vacuum.

The US Response to the Israeli Retaliation to Hamas

Bush has responded to the attack--through spokesman Gordon Johndroe:
"Hamas' continued rocket attacks into Israel must cease if the violence is to stop. Hamas must end its terrorist activities if it wishes to play a role in the future of the Palestinian people.

"The United States urges Israel to avoid civilian casualties as it targets Hamas in Gaza."
Powerline notes:
President Bush stands alone among the quoted leaders. He alone issued a statement declining to equate the parties or call on them both to cease...Contrary to the implication of the White House statement, however, Hamas's reason for being among "the Palestinian people" is terrorist.
Now let's see if Obama has anything to say.

Considering the response from the world to the Hizbollah-Israel war, one can imagine we have only begun to see the hand wringing that will come.

Israel's PR Response

Israel apparently is going to try to do a better job on the PR front:
Israel to mount emergency international PR effort in wake of Gaza campaign

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni on Saturday instructed the Foreign Ministry to take emergency measures to adapt Israel's international public relations to the ongoing escalation in the Gaza Strip.

Livni instructed senior ministry officials to open an aggressive and diplomatic international public relations campaign, in order to gain greater international support for Israel Defense Forces operations in the Gaza Strip.
Yeah, good luck with that--from Judeopundit:
Guardian: "Analysis: The latest attacks in Gaza rank with Deir Yassin and the Sabra and Shatila massacres"
Judeopundit explains the difference the difference, noting also the admission by the Palestinian Arabs themselves that the vast majority of those killed were the terrorists:
Israeli warplanes rained more than 100 tons of bombs on security sites in Hamas-ruled Gaza Saturday and early Sunday, killing at least 230 people in one of the Mideast conflict's bloodiest assaults in decades. The government said the open-ended campaign was aimed at stopping rocket attacks that have traumatized southern Israel.

Most of the casualties were security forces, but Palestinian officials said at least 15 civilians were among the dead. More than 400 people were also wounded.

Mere Rhetoric notices that The New York Times originally made the same observation:
The vast majority of those killed were Hamas police officers and security men, including two senior commanders, but the dead included several construction workers and at least two children in school uniforms.
--and then removed it.

And so it goes.
Sunday is another day...

Crossposted on Soccer Dad

Technorati Tag: and and .

This Chanukah, Gas Money--Like Oil--Can Be Stretched Longer Too!

From Newsbusters:
New data just released by the Oil Price Information Service reveals that we're currently spending $1 billion a day less on gasoline than we were back in July.
A great miracle is happening here...

[Hat tip: Instapundit]

Technorati Tag: .

Friday, December 26, 2008

Most Admired In The US: 2002 vs 2008

Cleveland Plain Dealer 12/29/02
Bush, Hillary Clinton most admired in U.S.


Gallup 12/26/08
Obama, Hillary Clinton Share “Most Admired” Billing

And according to CBS news in 2005:
Hillary is...the most popular woman in the country...
Funny thing is, in 4 years chances are that Hillary will retain her title; as for Obama, his mystique is already showing signs of tarnishing and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Who says Hillary has no chance of being President?

[Hat tip: Hot Air Headlines]

Technorati Tag: and .

Poll After Rockets Slam Into Israel: Israelis Support Military Operation In Gaza 60%:23%

Note how the contrary Haaretz poll was 'fixed'.
From IMRA:
Poll: Israelis support military operation in Gaza 60%:23%
Dr. Aaron Lerner 25 December 2008

Israel Television Channel One reported on the Mabat evening news that a poll
they commissioned yesterday (24 December) by Midgam found Israelis
overwhelming support a military operation in Gaza 60% to 23% opposed.

This results contrasts greatly from the loaded poll question commissioned by
Haaretz that was asked on 23 December - before the massive barrage of
rockets hit Israel.

The one-sided Ha'aretz question was designed to try and force respondents to
oppose a military operation: "Do you support a ground operation in the Gaza
Strip that may cause losses among IDF soldiers" - For 40% Against 46% Don't
know 14%
Technorati Tag: and .

Israel And The Hobgoblin Of Little Minds

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

A great person does not have to think consistently from one day to the next. This remark comes from the essay “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson does not explain the difference between foolish and wise consistency.

from The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. 2002.
Pity.
But I offer the following as an example of a foolish consistency.
Israel closed the crossing for all but humanitarian reasons because of rocket attacks from Gaza into Israel by Palestinian militants. But it opened three other crossings Friday, allowing fuel and commodities into the Palestinian territory for the first time in more than a week.

About 80 trucks filled with commodities were expected to cross into Gaza. Among the goods were 400,000 liters of fuel and 120 tons of cooking gas.

The decision to open the crossings at Kerem Shalom, Karni and Nahal Oz came after requests from international aid groups and Egypt, said Peter Lerner, a spokesman for the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories. In addition, he said, Israel has no desire to hurt the civilian population in Gaza.

Lerner said whether to keep the crossings open would be a daily decision. [emphasis added]
Does anyone seriously doubt what that daily decision will be?
Does anyone seriously doubt that these decisions will be consistently ignored by Israel's critics?

Technorati Tag: and .

Terrorists And Soup Kitchens

You can get a lot of mileage mixing good works and Kassams.
TERRORIZED TIMES

Rabbi Avi Shafran


In a column published on December 14, Clark Hoyt, The New York Times’ current Public Editor, or reader representative, addressed the paper’s choice of terminology for people who target civilians with the intent of killing them.

What brought Mr. Hoyt to address the issue was the Times’ assiduous avoidance of the word “terrorist” for the perpetrators of what has come to be known as the Mumbai Massacre – the late November Islamist attacks on hotels, a hospital, a railway station, a restaurant and a Jewish center in India’s largest city that left 173 dead and more than 300 injured. The attackers were called “militants,” “gunmen,” “attackers” and “assailants” in the paper of record’s reports but never “terrorists.” Some readers were offended; thus the public editor’s investigation and report.

He explained that “in the newsroom and at overseas bureaus, especially Jerusalem, there has been a lot of soul-searching about the terminology of terrorism.”
The upshot of the introspection, he continued, “to the dismay of supporters of Israel – and sometimes of the other side, denouncing Israeli military actions” is that “The Times is sparing in its use of ‘terrorist’ when reporting on that complex struggle.” (One wonders if, examples of the military actions denounced by the “other side” include the recent killing of three Palestinians by Israeli forces; the three were planting explosives in northern Gaza along a border fence and, when accosted, threw hand grenades at the Israeli soldiers, who then returned fire – and the three, none too soon, to their Maker.)

Later in his essay, Mr. Hoyt takes up the issue of Hamas, the Sunni group whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel and which has launched scores of suicide attacks against Israeli civilians (targeting, among other things, buses, hotels, supermarkets and restaurants) and has fired hundreds of missiles at Israeli cities and town. The group that exults in the murder and maiming of innocent men, women and children, that trains its young to feel the same way, that denies the Holocaust and expresses confidence that, as one of its leaders put it in a Hamas newspaper, “the Holocaust is still to come upon the Jews.” Mr. Hoyt explains that The Times chooses to not label Hamas a terrorist organization “though it sponsors acts of terror against Israel.”

The reason? Because it “was elected to govern Gaza” and “provides social services and operates charities, hospitals and clinics.” He quotes deputy news editor Phil Corbett, who said, “You get to the question: Somebody works in a Hamas clinic – is that person a terrorist? We don’t want to go there.” Mr. Hoyt concurs: “I think that is right.”

Well, Mr. Corbett and Mr. Hoyt may prefer not to go there, but as journalists they really should realize their responsibility to make the trip. The “there,” of course, is a different, and straightforward question: Does all an organization that routinely attacks innocents have to do to achieve respectability is garner the support of a population and open health clinics?

I’ve always been a foolhardy sort, so let me be the brave soul – there may even be others, if not in The Times’ newsroom – who is perfectly willing to go there: The answer is No. A terrorist group is a terrorist group, even if it runs a hospital, wins elections, operates a soup kitchen, recycles its plastics and cares for abandoned kittens.

And all who choose to support such a group or, by working under its auspices, to empower it are members of a terrorist group and, thereby, accessories to terrorism.

What’s more, media that are too weak-kneed to call evil what it is are, in their own way, complicit in the same.
© 2008 AM ECHAD RESOURCES
[Rabbi Shafran is director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America.]

Technorati Tag: and .

A Brit That Will Lead To Neither Tzedek Nor Shalom

I came across this from Brit Tzedek V'Shalom, founded by Marcia Freedman, who is also a member of J Street's Advisory Board. In an open letter to President-Elect Obama, they write:
We the undersigned, call on you, President-elect Obama, to pledge to make resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a top priority of your Administration.

While you come into office with a long list of problems before you, the long-simmering conflict between Israel and the Palestinians is among the most urgent. After eight years of half-hearted diplomacy, there is no time left to walk softly and hope for the best.

The consequences of failing to establish a durable peace are grim. The influence of Iran and Hezbollah would grow among an increasingly bitter Palestinian population, and extremists would have further excuse to do vicious battle with the West. It is difficult to calculate the damage that a downward spiral into fresh waves of violence could hold.

American Presidents traditionally look to the Jewish community for insight on Israel-related policy. As Jewish clergy, we pledge to mobilize our people behind your leadership for a mutually-acceptable, two-state solution. We pledge to support you through difficult, trying times, and to celebrate with you when the job is done. We pledge to let the American public know: An American President who dedicates himself to the establishment of a durable Israeli-Palestinian peace acts in the best interests of Israel and the United States.

* We call on you to dedicate yourself to the establishment of a viable Palestinian state living in peace alongside Israel early in your first term.

* We call on you to appoint, within your first 100 days in office, a high-level, highly-regarded envoy to the region, an individual who has the ear of both Israelis and Palestinians, the respect of the American people, and ready access to your Oval Office.

* We call on you to establish mechanisms of enforcement and follow-through, so that decisions made and agreements signed will be respected and brought to fruition.
"American Presidents traditionally look to the Jewish community for insight on Israel-related policy."--apparently, they have never heard of the State Department.

Amazing, calling on Obama to push a square peg through a round hole.

Are they oblivious to the fact that the Palestinians are not ready for a state and that a state at this point would only create another base for terrorist attacks?

And to top it all off--they do not even try to distinguish between the PA and Hamas. They don't even mention them! In other words, they are not pushing for a state on the West Bank alone, but dealing with Hamas just as with the PA.

Forget the reality on the ground--just have Obama create a second Palestinian state!

Similarly, they have a letter to Olmert, asking that he take it easy on Gaza, repeating the Hamas line on conditions in Gaza.

There is plenty of room for debate, but at least let's recognize some basic realities.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad

Technorati Tag: .