Thursday, July 08, 2010

Want To Get A Human Rights Activist Talking? Say "Guantanamo". Want To Shut Him Up? Say "Shalit"

Elena Bonner on Gilad Schalit, in a speech to the Freedom Forum in Oslo on May 19, 2009.
And another question that has been a thorn for me for a long time. It's a question for my human rights colleagues. Why doesn't the fate of the Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit trouble you in the same way as does the fate of the Guantanamo prisoners?

You fought for and won the opportunity for the International Committee of the Red Cross, journalists and lawyers to visit Guantanamo. You know prison conditions, the prisoners' everyday routine, their food. You have met with prisoners subjected to torture. The result of your efforts has been a ban on torture and a law to close this prison. President Obama signed it in the first days of his coming to the White House. And although he, just like president Bush before him, does not know what to do with the Guantanamo prisoners, there is hope that the new administration will think up something.

But during the two years Schalit has been held by terrorists, the world human rights community has done nothing for his release. Why? He is a wounded soldier, and fully falls under the protection of the Geneva Conventions. The conventions say clearly that hostage-taking is prohibited, that representatives of the Red Cross must be allowed to see prisoners of war, especially wounded prisoners, and there is much else written in the Geneva Conventions about Schalit's rights. The fact that representatives of the Quartet conduct negotiations with the people who are holding Schalit in an unknown location, in unknown conditions, vividly demonstrates their scorn of international rights documents and their total legal nihilism. Do human rights activists also fail to recall the fundamental international rights documents?
But as we have seen, those who (claim to) carry the banners of international law and human rights are a selective bunch, and picky about when they will stand up (in front of the camera) and when they will not.

Technorati Tag: .

1 comment:

NormanF said...

The human rights community has been taken over by the Left. And it come to hold a selective and highly politicized view of human rights. Which includes an obsession with Israel and assigning a low priority to human right abuses in the Third World and in Islamist regimes. Don't look for this pattern of human rights activism to change much in the future.