Jamal al Dura, who claims that Israelis fired at him and his son in 2000, was in fact injured by axe blade and not bullets in 1992, according to an Israeli surgeon who performed reconstructive surgery on the wounds two years later. PJM’s Nidra Poller reports on the latest startling development in the mother of all fauxtography cases.Read the whole thing.
The wounds purportedly sustained on September 30 2000 by Jamal al Dura “target of gunfire from the Israeli positions”—in the words of France 2 bureau chief Charles Enderlin—were in fact incurred in 1992. Jamal, identified as the father of the shahid [martyr] Mohamed al Dura, is one of the two living witnesses to the incident that triggered the “Al Aqsa Intifada.” The al Dura news report has been the subject of controversy for seven years.
Sunday, December 16, 2007
The Father In The 2000 Al-Dura Hoax Got His Wounds 8 Years Earlier
Nidra Poller has been covering the developing story of the Al-Dura Hoax for Pajamas Media. Looks like one more chain supporting the hoax has been broken:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment