Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Why Bother Refuting The Al Dura Hoax?

At Pajamas Media, there is video of the Roger Simon interview Philippe Karsenty, who was sued for slander by France2"Why Pajamas Media Pays So Much Attention to Al Dura"
Why are we paying so much attention to this legal battle in France, which is based on a disputed event in Gaza over seven years ago (2000)? Well, certainly not to gain clicks or attention on the Internet, I regret to say.

We are following this because part of the mission of Pajamas Media is to examine the errors and omissions of mainstream media and try to understand why they occurred and to correct them. This began with the Dan Rather affair, which gave this company its name.

The Al Dura affair is arguably more important than Rather. The American anchorman lost his job for promulgating false documents about Bush’s National Guard service.

The France 2 news footage - shot by Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma and then produced and narrated by the French-Israeli anchorman Charles Enderlin – blames the Israeli army for child murder. What could be worse than that?

This Al Dura video, and the subsequent photo excised from it of the supposedly dead boy, has been called the “Mother of All Fauxtography.” And that could be so – at least for our time. (False photos, art and documents incriminating nations and ethnic groups are an ancient phenomenon.)

The phony photograph went round the world, inspiring Muslims everywhere to hatred of Israelis and Jews and helping to foment and justify the second Intifada. The photo appeared on postage stamps and on billboards throughout the Islamic world and Western Europe. Public squares and streets were named for the “martyred” boy. The murderers of Daniel Pearl claimed they were avenging young Mohammed’s death at the very moment they slit the American journalist’s throat.

When I was in Paris in 2004, I saw the fake photograph blown up on posters and displayed all over the Left Bank and at historic locations like the Luxembourg Gardens. No one thought to question it. The Israelis had killed the boy. It was as potent a piece of propaganda for our time as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was for an earlier epoch, perhaps more so, because it was virtually uncontested.

Pajamas Media will stay on this case until this calumny is corrected and France 2 publicly admits its errors.
The former may actually be easier than the latter.

Pajamas Media has an overview of the Al Dura video and the ongoing story.

[Hat tip: Instapundit]

Technorati Tag: and and .


SnoopyTheGoon said...

Be it as it may, and I have also posted on this, wishing Karsenty all success possible, I am afraid that the story (precisely as the Protocols and other anti-Semitic myths) has already a life of its own and no mere facts will be able to debunk it.

Daled Amos said...

But if we can put the hoax in the same category as the Protocols as opposed to the myth of 'occupation'--that would be an accomplishment.